Search the Community

Hi all. First post here. I've searched this forum and others for some information but could not find exactly what I need, so decided to join and ask. May or may not be relevant: both me and the vehicle are Canadian. Dealing with a 2016 Edge (Titanium) with the 2.0 engine. Have received the P2112 trouble code a couple of times and think we have it narrowed down to a faulty ETB (electronic throttle body). I have found a lot of info, videos, TSBs, etc. but they primarily deal with the 3.5 and 3.7 litre engines. Regardless, since Ford seems to have a huge issue with the ETBs in a lot of vehicles in their lineup, I decided to replace it myself. TSB 16-0139 specifies that for the 2016 Edge with 2.0 ETB part number DS7Z-9E926-D should be used, but when I ask my local Ford dealer about that part number, they do not list it for this vehicle, but it would be appropriate if it had the 2.7. Their listing calls for a DS7Z-9E926-C. The -D part is about $155 CDN and is in stock; the -C part is over $500 and a couple of days away. Rock Auto has the -D listed for about $74 CDN (but it's not listed if you look it up by year/make/model). They don't list the -C Ford part, but they list aftermarket parts that cross reference from the -C for much less than the $500 Ford part. To further confuse things, the RA lookup under Y/M/M offers Motorcraft TB37 as an option for $266. What is the "long" Ford part number that equates to Motorcraft TB37? Has anyone replaced their ETB on a 2016 Edge 2.0? What part number did you use, and was it successful? Thanks in advance.

I'm trying to remove the intake manifold to access the fuel injectors on my 2017 2.0L Ecoboost. (the next step in my quest to diagnose a repeated cylinder #2 misfire). The brake booster hose runs into the right side of the manifold & seems to require a special tool for removal, or at least I think so. The coupler is red, round and smooth (there's no clips). Does anyone have experience with this hose/coupler and what it takes to remove it? I've searched this forum and the internet and can't seem to find any mention of it. thanks!

Took the first long trip with the new 2.0, coming from the 3.5 v6. As I had already noticed, it is a bit of a different powerband with the 2.0 being more "torquey" throughout the powerband. The 3.5 is the traditional set up we are all used to for 35 years- normally aspirated with predictable up shifts and down shifts. The 2.0 seems less responsive because it may not down shift when accelerating from a cruising speed, but it will pull just fine if you have a bit of patience. Just a bit. Fully loaded with luggage and 2 adults mostly on 81s through the blu ridge mountains we got just under 25 mpg, 70-75 with a/c on. This is hilly terrain. On the way home on 95n mostly flat we did a bit better at 26.5. So my conclusion on the gas mileage is it is only about 10% better than the 6 on the same trip. We are getting 26.5 average during normal mixed- mostly side roads every day driving which the 3.5 delivered just around 20 so every day driving is the big fuel savings over the 3.5 and this is where it counts as it is the bulk of the milage. Short hiway trips unloaded we are seeing about 28. My opinion is the 2.0 is a quite impressive 4 banger that takes a little getting used to but is a fine engine. Also in the life of the vehicle- less shifting may logically extend transmission life which is a good thing but yet to be proven.

Anyone have some longevity data on these engines? Ford is already replacing the 2.0 ecoboost as of the 2016 model I believe. I was just curious seeing as how my 2012 Ford edge has 117,000+ miles on it and was not sure how much I could get out of it. I have seen older models such as 2008 with an excess of 230,000 miles but these are not ecoboost engines. If I have the highest mileage on the forum I will begin keeping a more detailed account of any maintenance. Best, B