Seriously. The rear red LED tail light isn't ascetics you can see LEDS for much further then regular light. Having a larger tail light gives motorists more visibility, Hence safety while I will agree the front lights are ascetic at nest but stating a larger tail light has no effect on safety is simply wrong.
https://chemlinks.beloit.edu/BlueLight/pages/hp/an1155-3.pdf
Ascetics are ground effects front LED, lighting interior LED, lighting, black grill, can be options. even inflatable seat belts (which i do have) buts its been proven more rear light decreases accidents
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) repeated Voevodsky's experiment on a larger scale, and concluded that center high mounted stop lamps, as the government calls them, reduce accidents and injuries. As a result, in 1986, NHTSA began requiring all new cars to have a third brake light. The agency extended that requirement to all new light trucks in 1994.
To see just how well the third brake lights worked, NHTSA charted police-reported crash data from eight states, and found that these lights reduced rear impacts by 4.3 percent. Although less dramatic than the original findings, this means that since the lights became standard equipment, there have been about 200,000 fewer crashes, 60,000 fewer injuries, and more than $600 million in property damage saved every year — not to mention lives saved.
More recently, researchers are turning their attention to the question of whether new light-emitting diode (LED) brake lights may be more effective than older incandescent bulbs at preventing rear-end collisions. Preliminary data suggest that LED lights may reduce crashes.
With this being said for the third breakelight addition wouldn't it further reduce the risk adding more light to the back?