Fair enough. I just don't see why calling it a ST is such a problem. There is only so much they can do with the platforms they're given. I expect the Explorer ST based on the RWD CD6 to be spectacular since they won't be hampered with a transverse platform.
So just because it doesn't measure up to YOUR standards they shouldn't sell it? Mmmkay.
It's an improved Edge Sport. Nothing more nothing less. If you don't want it don't buy it.
I guess you don’t understand Ford Performance. It’s the old SVT team. They do a lot more tuning than the regular Edge team did with the Sport.
You didn’t answer the question - what else do you think they should have done with it?
By the time you apply torque management to the 3.0 you probably don't get any more than the tuned 2.7. Power to the wheels is probably the same.
In RWD form with the 10 speed tranny the 3.0L can be fully unleashed.
Smoking or tinting headlights is a really bad idea. But if you're going to ignore us and the law and do it anyway, just do it and don't try to rationalize it.
What exactly makes you say this? The tuned 2.7LEB is pretty much at the platform maximum for power so nothing to add there. Big brake kit and a tuned suspension. Not sure what else you think it should have. It’s not a sports car.
Just to clarify - those were passenger car tires not crossover tires. But I wouldn't hesitate to buy Continentals based on that experience.
If only they made them to fit the 21s.
Just a guess here but I’m thinking the new drivetrain can only handle the 2.7L without torque management (or without too much TM). So adding the 3.0L may not buy much. 3.0L might end up being a longitudinal engine only.
They can absolutely change it using their IDS tool (not Forscan). Explain to them that it's no longer in the menu and that they need to change it with IDS.