Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Now, that I am the proud owner of a 2011 Limited with the Sony Sound System, I do feel it's time to change the speakers and amplification since things aren't as clean as I would like.

 

Given that I am not a person who installs Audio, I will be turning my Edge over to Audio Expression in Mesa, AZ for the install.

 

Components:

 

3.5" speakers: So far the choices are the following:

 

JL Audio: http://www.jlaudio.com/c2-350x-car-audio-c2-coaxial-systems-99611

Boston Acoustics: http://www.bostonacoustics.com/SE35-P760.aspx

Morel Tempo: http://www.morelhifi.com/car-audio/tempo (May involve some modification due to speaker's 4" size)

 

6.5" Components (Front Door and stock tweeter location):

 

Morel Tempo: http://www.morelhifi.com/car-audio/tempo/tempo-2-way-2

JL Audio: http://www.jlaudio.com/c2-650-car-audio-c2-speaker-systems-99617

Boston Acoustics: http://www.bostonacoustics.com/SR60-P604.aspx

 

6.5" Coax (Rear Door)

 

Morel Tempo 6: http://www.morelhifi.com/car-audio/tempo/tempo-coax-2

JL Audio: http://www.jlaudio.com/c2-650x-car-audio-c2-coaxial-systems-99618

Boston Acoustics: http://www.bostonacoustics.com/SE65-P756.aspx

 

Subwoofer:

 

Kicker Comp VT: http://www.kicker.com/CompVT

Morel Ultimo 802: http://www.morelhifi.com/car-audio/ultimo

Boston Acoustics: http://www.bostonacoustics.com/G108-P570.aspx

Rockford Fosgate: http://www.rockfordfosgate.com/products/product_details.aspx?itemid=129171

 

Main Amp:

 

Tru Technology: http://www.trutechnology.com/images/products/b4100s_full.jpg

 

Subwoofer Amp:

JL Audio or Tru

 

Any thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

When I do audio upgrades I try to stick with as few brands as possible. My opinion is that you should go with the Boston Acoustics for everything but the sub. For the sub you can't go wrong with the R|2 Fosgate. Keep in mind that the rear subwoofer box can easily be modified to hold a 10" sub and mine (which was done up with a 10" pioneer low profile sub) really kicks some ass and it keeps things looking just like they did when the car rolled off the assembly line.

That's my 2 cents.

 

When are you planning on starting this project or have you already started it?

Edited by Cdpratt69
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cdpratt: Right now, I am in the research phase to determine the costs for this project so I can start stacking the coins. I did look at your setup and I like how you have the amps in the spare tire well. I would like to do that because I don't want to lose the ability to fold my seats down. With your sub in the spare, where is your spare tire? If there is a way to do that w/o losing my spare, I might be interested in doing that. I am also tempted to incorporate an EQ in there.

 

As for mixing brands, are you saying that based solely on timbre? I know with home theater systems, you have to use the same brand of speaker for the center channel as you do the fronts because each brand may have a different timbre and can affect sound quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My spare tire is now a can of Slime, aka fix-a-flat! My wife is in the insurance business and I added roadside assistance and flatbed towing to my policy. Believe it or not you can get that specific! If there is a way to do what I did and put the larger sub in the spare area and still carry a spare I sure don't know of it.

 

As for keeping the brands the same throughout, in my opinion it has everything to do with timbre. I see a good car audio system the same as a rolling home theater. I feel like sticking with one brand gets you as close as possible to the manufacturers desired effect. In other words, Boston Acoustics engineered their stuff to work well all together rather than to mesh in with say Rockford Fosgate or some other brand. I hope I'm making sense here.

 

On a side note, it's kind of funny but my profession is actually in the home theater business. I design and install systems for both builders and home owners. I thought it amusing that you used that as an example! Coincidence? I think not!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a side note, it's kind of funny but my profession is actually in the home theater business. I design and install systems for both builders and home owners. I thought it amusing that you used that as an example! Coincidence? I think not!

 

Indeed. I work in IT but have an interest in car audio and home theater.

 

As for BA, I have had a good history with them. When I had a 1994 Maxima, I replaced the rear speakers with BA coaxes running off of an Eclipse head unit and the stock (read: Clarion) amp. It actually sounded pretty nice. Given that we have Sony systems in our vehicles and how they are interconnected with a ton of other things, I definitely don't want to change that out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figured you had some electronics background or something in the IT area. It appeared to me you know your stuff. I used the Audio Source LC6i rather than the LCQ-1 in order to save a bit of money. The LCQ-1 adds equalization over the LC6i otherwise they do the same thing as far as integration of high level signals to low level inputs for the highly involved systems like our Sony systems. All the RF amps I am using have the punch EQ knobs and I had them installed in the center stack just in front of the center console hatch so I can adjust things on the fly since you tend to get different output between CDs, FM, Satellite, and MP3 players. They all do different things because of varying signals and compression.

 

About the BA speakers. My friend on here, Dingo, uses all Boston Acoustic speakers and he loves the sound of all his. He gives all their stuff a glowing recommendation. Keep me posted on your progress and take pics along the way!

 

Good luck!

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prinzll,

 

I did not change any of the stock wiring from the head unit to the Sony amp because that would pretty much be a worthless task in my opinion. The moster cable goes from the Sony amp to the audio control LC6i and then of course quality RCA cables from that unit to the amps then monster cable to the speakers from there.

 

Hope that makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I forgot to mention that the shop gave me two different quotes. One quote was for replacing all speakers, adding two amps, and the RF 360. The other was leaving the stock speakers (surround, and D pillar) powered by the factory amp. Guess which one was $1,000 less....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sub that is mounted behind my back panel in the original location has a mounting depth of 3-3/8". Maybe that info will help. The original Sony sub has a fairly large magnet for being a stock speaker in my opinion. I guess that is not a bad thing because the panel prob had to be designed to make room for it. I am just guessing here but it looks to me like there isnt much more room back there for anything larger than a 10" sub box or a depth more than 3.5". The stock Sony amp is back there as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then, the sub decision may orient toward the original choice of the Rockford Fosgate shallow mount sub. When you put your 10" shallow mount, did you have to modify the side panels? Soundwerks wants to cut up my side panels and try to make it look stock. I am not trying to hack anything visible up on the Edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...