EDST777

!

Somebody who owns FORD EDGE 2006-2010 with the European step of scanning of FM through 0.1 (Europe, the United Arab Emirates) respond. Than there are no such? Your help is necessary.

thanks for your answer. I am afraid to be mistaken in interpretation of your recommendation, but how I have understood you you recommend this means?)! as using this means it is possible to make a lot of useful work without removing and without sorting many parts? I have correctly understood you? After this procedure with SF, my consumption of gasoline in the city shall decrease? I correctly understand?) p.s.: also interests me what you think of replacement of the fuel filter, it is usually recommended to replace after cleaning of nozzles when SF pour into a tank? How it will be in our case, we have a lifelong fuel filter?

With new oil, the expense has decreased by two liters, I think 5w-30 gave more protection to the engine on the highway, and it is good to apply it in the summer on the highway, but in the city it is necessary for us 5w-20, it does a gasoline consumption less. Now I wish to clear for prevention of a nozzle how you think?

thanks, but I thought a little of another, namely, there is a wish to understand when to regulate a rope and when to regulate on the brake rotor the toothed screw which is similar to a barrel. My problem is that a sole rotor already holds poorly and I would like to increase effort of a clip of a boot of a rotor to hold better. The rope as I think is regulated when the course of a pedal of the parking brake is strongly increased. I am mistaken? p.s.: to t.a interests me in what cases adjustment is carried out by the cogwheel specified on the image by an arrow ,and why nothing is told about it in the user's guide?

Yes, I wish to clean nozzles and to make it most softly and safely, thank you, but why those people don't know about danger of damage of elastic bands of SF? They didn't read our forum?)

Studying a manual, in the specified procedure nothing is told about that how exactly to regulate a parking (emergency) brake, it is only possible to guess it (to rotate clockwise and counterclockwise). I about what - that do not know in a manual?!) On other Ford models it is accurately specified how it to make? Your thoughts? or specify to me, please, this place of the management!) SECTION 206-05: Parking Brake and Actuation 2008 Edge/MKX Workshop Manual REMOVAL AND INSTALLATION Procedure revision date: 09/14/2007 Parking Brake Shoes Item Part Number Description 1 2648 Parking brake shoe 2 2L642 Parking brake shoe return spring Removal and Installation Remove the rear brake disc. For additional information, refer to Section 206-04 .Remove the parking brake shoe return spring.Remove the parking brake shoe.To install, reverse the removal procedure. Check the parking brake for normal operation.

somebody?!)

when I had such problems, the mistake really could be fixed not from the first

tell why these sensors so often break, at ford it is an expendable material?)

I have made it, but in two steps, I regret that has not listened to you, it would help me not to do excess work). In November, 2015 I have replaced the TSS sensor, till April everything was normal, without mistakes, but in April the problem has appeared again, this time there was OSS error (which did not shine earlier). Now I have replaced the OSS sensor. Interestingly, it is natural, the period of replacement of sensors of 70000-100 000 km or it was a production defect of sensors, there is a wish to know why they break also what influences it? If it is each 100 000 km, then Ford has to write down it in scheduled works)!

Somebody....!? really nobody did it?)

Replace as recommended me TSS/OSS sensors you did it?

Thanks, but what you think of SF16 seafoam cleaner what of cleaners will be better?

hi, I cannot understand whether it is dangerous such procedure and whether it makes sense? But here what is written here https://www.cargurus.com/Cars/Discussion-c9095_ds501727 and http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/888305-seafoam-questions.html and http://www.focusfanatics.com/forum/general-technical-chat/258745-how-use-seafoam-motor-treatment.html , says that it reduces a gasoline consumption. Your opinion on it. It is applicable?! Here my subject about a gasoline consumption on my Ford EDGE 2008 AWD http://www.fordedgeforum.com/topic/15255-fuel-consumption-1258-mpg-in-the-city-on-awd-2008-your-thoughts/ , after replacement of Ford Formula 5w30 oil by Fuchs 5w20, my consumption of gasoline it was cut approximately on two liters and now in the city it is 17.2 liters, but nevertheless it is a lot of in comparison with others?! In plans to try PetroCanada 0w-20 oil for now I want to understand what effect of means of seafoam? P.s.: In the instruction to this means it is told that after procedure of cleaning it is necessary to replace the oil and fuel filter, but we have a lifelong fuel filter! What to do with replacement of the fuel filter? People who did it, tell please!

ok ).Thanks.

Thanks I think also. I am adjusted on Titan oil, that factor is also important that it isn't so known and has less fakes. But I didn't find a viscosity index on this oil and amounts of ashes. But I found information that this PAO oil (pure synthetics), unlike Mobil1 AFE which seems hydrocracking. Nevertheless argument.

I found at myself in the city the German oil, which especially for Ford. It TITAN SUPERSYN F ECO-B 5W-20 Approvals • FORD M2C948-B Recommendations of FUCHS • ACEA A1/B1 • FORD M2C925-B Standard characteristics Parameter Unit Value Method Density at 15 °C of g/ml 0,851 DIN 51757 ASTM 2,5 DIN ISO 2049 color Temperature of flash of °C of 232 DIN ISO 2592 Dynamic viscosity at -30 °C мПа*с 3910 DIN 51398 Kinematic viscosity at 40 °C of mm2/с 42,2 DIN 51562-1 Kinematic viscosity at 100 °C of mm2/с 7,9 DIN 51562-1 Dynamic viscosity at 150 °C мПа*с 2,6 CEC L-036-90 Your opinion?

https://mobiloil.com/en/motor-oils/mobil-1/mobil-1-advanced-fuel-economy

I am afraid that Mobil1 Fuel Economy 0w30 and Mobil1 ESP 0w30 have different characteristics. I am afraid that it is various oils. I am not right? What your thoughts? p.s.: And at present only Mobil1 Fuel Economy 0w30 is available to me from a line of Mobil. https://mobiloil.com/en/motor-oils/mobil-1/mobil-1-advanced-fuel-economy Specifications and approvals Mobil 1 0W-20 Advanced Fuel Economy synthetic oil meets or exceeds the requirements of: API SN, SM, SL, SJ ILSAC GF-5 Ford WSS-M2C947-A Mobil 1 0W-20 Advanced Fuel Economy has the following builder approvals: General Motors Service Fill dexos1™ (license number GB1D0415015) According to ExxonMobil, Mobil 1 0W-20 Advanced Fuel Economy is of the following quality level: General Motors GM 6094M API CF Technical details SAE Grade 0W-20 Viscosity, @ 100ºC, cSt (ASTM D445) 8.7 Viscosity, @ 40ºC, cSt (ASTM D445) 44.8 Viscosity Index 173 Sulfated Ash, wt% (ASTM D874) 0.8 HTHS Viscosity, mPa•s @ 150ºC (ASTM D4683) 2.7 Phosphorous (ASTM D4951) 0.065 Flash Point, ºC (ASTM D92) 224 Total Base Number (ASTM D2896) 8.8 MRV @ -40ºC (ASTM D4684) 9200 Density @15.6ºC g/ml (ASTM D4052) 0.841 View product data sheet for Mobil 1™ 0W-20 Advanced Fuel Economy

Thanks. You consider, what on valves there has to be a deposit if oil wasn't truly chosen? About oxygen sensors, I thought of it but if they aren't serviceable, it is noticeable visually, at the car exhaust gases accept gray color, the car works at strongly enriched mix or on the contrary doesn't receive gasoline in the necessary volume. It would be noticeable. But at me here everything is all right, the engine perfectly works, (knock knock knock on a tree), exhaust gases in norm, aren't present a soot, there is no oil deposit, there is no gray smoke, it gives the chance to judge, though directly that with oxygen sensors everything is all right and with valves. What do you think of my thoughts? Yes our quality of gasoline concedes, but I am ready to allocate for it a half of gallon (2 liters of losses as much as possible). How still it is possible without removing to make sensors of oxygen check, your thoughts? I have a cord of ELS of 27 https://www.drive2.ru/l/3062634/ it ODBLink MX http://www.ebay.com/itm/OBDLink-MX-Bluetooth-OBD2-High-Speed-diagnostic-interface-UK-Distributor-/111837315869?hash=item1a0a06031d:g:9ZEAAOSwDNdVvHuV is similar, reads all tires, watches all sensors, there is a graphic type of supervision over sensors is it is possible to use at diagnostics? There are ideas as to make it? I don't know what parameters have to be in norm, but obtain data from these sensors I have opportunity by means of ELS 27 cord. By the way about a cord, I wrote already that diagnostics by a cord doesn't show mistakes. At not the serviceable sensor of oxygen there are errors of diagnostics or it isn't possible? Any thoughts.

I have at this time is only available oil Liqui MOLY Special Tec AA 5W- 20, but I doubt it , what is your opinion? Specifications Ford : Ford WSS-M2C 930 -A Ford WSS-M2C 925 -A Ford WSS-M2C 945 -A Chrysler MS- 6395 Daihatsu Honda Hyundai Kia Isuzu Mazda Mitsubishi DiaQueen Nissan Suzuki Toyota Subaru GM There is our specification Ford WSS-M2C 930 -A , but what you think of this oil? At the moment I want to compare castrol 5w20, formula F 5w30 and Liqui MOLY Special Tec AA 5W- 20 , Mobil1 0w30 advanced fuel economy. To me it is available only these oils with specifications Ford.

Well, thanks for the help! From everything told, I draw many conclusions. Now I will try to look for oil synthetic 5w20 any where technical admissions of Ford are specified, I will consult on you in a choice. I ask the first council already now: what do you think of oil 0w20 and 0w30 (what of them to prefer for winter being guided on specified 5w20 in the user's guide)? I have at this time is only available oil Liqui MOLY Special Tec AA 5W- 20, but I doubt it , what is your opinion? Specifications Ford : Ford WSS-M2C 930 -A Ford WSS-M2C 925 -A Ford WSS-M2C 945 -A Chrysler MS- 6395 Daihatsu Honda Hyundai Kia Isuzu Mazda Mitsubishi DiaQueen Nissan Suzuki Toyota Subaru GM I have at this time is only available oil Liqui MOLY Special Tec AA 5W- 20, but I doubt it , what is your opinion? Specifications Ford : Ford WSS-M2C 930 -A Ford WSS-M2C 925 -A Ford WSS-M2C 945 -A Chrysler MS- 6395 Daihatsu Honda Hyundai Kia Isuzu Mazda Mitsubishi DiaQueen Nissan Suzuki Toyota Subaru GM I have at this time is only available oil Liqui MOLY Special Tec AA 5W- 20, but I doubt it , what is your opinion? Specifications Ford : Ford WSS-M2C 930 -A Ford WSS-M2C 925 -A Ford WSS-M2C 945 -A Chrysler MS- 6395 Daihatsu Honda Hyundai Kia Isuzu Mazda Mitsubishi DiaQueen Nissan Suzuki Toyota Subaru GM I have at this time is only available oil Liqui MOLY Special Tec AA 5W- 20, but I doubt it , what is your opinion? Specifications Ford : Ford WSS-M2C 930 -A Ford WSS-M2C 925 -A Ford WSS-M2C 945 -A Chrysler MS- 6395 Daihatsu Honda Hyundai Kia Isuzu Mazda Mitsubishi DiaQueen Nissan Suzuki Toyota Subaru GM

This year after replacement of oil in the engine, replacements of the filter of the engine, replacement of oil in PTU, cleanings of the conditioner and a radiator of poplar down I nullified the computer and quickly during the day received an expense of 16 liters on 100 km .no as I went!?) I very easily touched an accelerator pedal, is gentle as to the girl, turns of the engine didn't exceed 2500 revolutions per minute, and the speed of 30-40km/h, I tried not to stop on traffic lights and about a miracle and an expense fell to 16 liters on the computer. But unless it is so necessary to drive the car where the engine 3.5 liters and 265 horsepowers. I don't arrange sports arrivals, no, I go usually in the normal adequate mode, but then there will be also an expense much more than 16 liters on 100 km, and to go gently touching with an accelerator on 3 millimeters this same not correctly. P.s. Yes, still a month ago I replaced the TSS sensor and a year ago I replaced oil Valvoline Max Life in transmission.